I don't have a clear idea of why I make the
work I make. I make that work that I can make, and the only way to have it be
made is if I make it myself. I don't remember this fact when I'm writing
manifestos, but I sense that manifesto-writing has very little to do with art
and I trust that impulse. I can't think for a while and then go do a few hours
of challenging but fun whatever I do to make my work to make my work. the work
makes itself.
why call it a manifesto anyway? because
something should appear if I write it down? that's not how the work makes
itself. writing isn't really a part of my artistic practice. writing is
thinking my brain enjoys with words, which let me think. art is something my
body likes to do, because there are no words and art doesn't want me to think.
thinking is something that happens
elsewhere, and what it makes - what language makes - is absence. I have a body,
and what I want it to make has everything to do with what I think a body is. but. I want to think my work is about sex and death (which are the thematic focuses
of my work.) the work doesn't want that. the work wants to make itself, not the
work I make with words.
my body is more honest than I am, which is
why I have to let it do it's job. ethical art is letting the body do its job. it doesn't lie. if I was asked to write down my passions in list form, my body would absolutely
stop working and I would start thinking about sex and death. I would start
thinking about memory and the personal vs. the political. I might start to
think about limitation, disjuncture, knowledge/power, and ethics.
but sometimes by coincidence I might think about how I can be a good person, then almost accidentally pick up some
charcoal, make a mark, and be made good.
No comments:
Post a Comment