Walead
Beshty’s Performances Under Working
Conditions documents traces and examines the interactions between humans
and mundane objects. Having a concept of “procedure” as an artistic theme and
experimenting with it in art have always been my interest, and so did why
Beshty’s pieces caught my eyes.
This
series use the preexisting design of gallery tables and desktops recreated in
copper duplicates to “explore the ways in which objects accrue and produce
meanings through their placement and circulation in the world” by allowing
gallery staffs to resume their normal everyday work activities on them throughout the summer.
It is apparent that the copper preserved the staff’s coffee rings,
rested palms and elbows, scratches and even what appear to be bare foot prints,
all originating from the nexus of the staffs’ day-to-day activities at the
desk. These traces eventually “oxidized to mercurial stain” and recorded their
movements and time. As such, Beshty offers evidence of the everyday actions
performed by the staff—at least those that came into contact with one of the
surfaces—which typically remain disconnected from the works hanging on the
gallery walls.
However, whether or not this information is interesting in any way
is debatable. It is interesting how within this procedure, he highlights- or
even embellishes- the mundane into grand
ways through the use of highly vibrant copper materials. Yet, what does it mean
by recording the traces and time of our daily-procedur in an artificial way, and then discharge them from its original
context to hang them on a gallery wall as if they were
canvases?
For me, the copper pieces show us alluring marks of “discourse,
transaction and negotiation” that become meaningless
when taken out of the context of their original environments. Whether or not this dislocation/ loss
of meaning was Beshty’s intention, at least for me, this was where the
installation fails: the over-crowded arrangement of these copper desks suffocates
the sensual and informative value of both the individual pieces and the series
as a whole. Nor did the installation give the impression of ironically
referencing the original utilitarian environment.
Though first drawn into these works with interests, it left me with many critical questions. Yet, all I could say for now is that it was indeed "The Performances Under Working Conditions."
No comments:
Post a Comment