In
a Station of the Metro
The
apparition of these faces in the crowd;
petals on a wet, black
bough.
Ezra
Pound
SPACE.com/NASA/SDO/AIA
- A burst of solar material leaps off the left side of the sun in
what’s known as a prominence eruption. This image combines three
images from NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory captured on May 3,
2013, at 1:45 pm
What
is an image?
I'm
not going to make any kind of a serious attempt to answer this huge
question but here are some random thoughts that occur to me. I start
with my native language, Hebrew, and with one possible beginning, the
old testament.
There
are four different Hebrew words with biblical origin that can be
translated as “image”: TZELEM, DMUT, PESEL and TMUNA. Each sheds
a different light on the nature of images.
“ZELEM”
is derived from the word “Zel” meaning a shadow, the outline or
shape of a shadow. It is mentioned in Genesis (1:26) in the story of
the creation of man “God created man in his own image, in the image
of God created he him; male and female created he them”.
“DMUT”
is also mentioned in the story of creation meaning “resemblance”
and “appearance”: “And God said, Let us make man in our image,
after our likeness:”. The parent root of the Hebrew word is
derived from the word DAM, blood (one descended from the “blood”
of another often resembles the one descended from) and the child root
of DAM is DAMAH meaning “to resemble”.
“PESEL”
means literally statue, sculpture and the root PASAL means to
carve or sculpt an image. The word is mentioned in Exodus (20:4) in
connection with the prohibition to produce images which are created
specifically to be worshipped.
“TMUNA”
comes from the root MIN indicating type, sort, or species. Because
all animals of the same species look alike, the word TMUNA, derived
from MIN means a likeness.
Both
“PESEL” and “TMUNA” are mentioned in the command that
prohibits the forming of images after God's likeness “Thou shalt
not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of anything that
is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in
the water under the earth”. The command ensures monotheism,
prohibiting the artistic production of other gods.
The
four meanings of the biblical “image”: shadow, resemblance,
likeness (sameness) and the production of divine images (both in the
sense of divine activity and the produced image of the divine)
indicate a split, a cut, a gap inherent in the very nature of
“image”, in the very nature of any re-presentation, any image
production. Particularly in the context of the story of creation and
re-creation, this inevitable slippage marks the tragic character of
images. We, god's creatures, carry by our very “of the image”
being, the mark of immortal creativity, immortal creation, but at the
same time, mortal as we are, we cannot retain perfection nor
wholeness. Likewise, the existence of image is defined by its own
limits; a questionable existence that is always a shadow of the
origin, a sameness of another, a likeness to other, a tangible object
that yearns for “otherness”; other “nature” (immortal), other
form or other meaning or as a resistance to all of those. Human
beings indeed, are allowed to create in their own image, like god,
but unlike god, their creation is mortal. In the same manner, man, like god, can create
new images but they are doomed to belong in the kingdom of
“Shadows”; a repetition, a re-production of an “origin”, a
mere re-presentation of an “experience”, “idea”, “life”
if you will.
Image
in this sense, as well as creativity that propels its birth, is indeed tragic; I'm thinking about the longing for the source, the
impossibility to attain perfection. I'm thinking of the inevitable
distance between the subject and object, between experience and
reality, between the actual line and it's idea. I'm thinking about
the struggle of images to survive their own limits; The efforts to
attain the unattainable and the inevitable drive that makes us create
and makes us die into it and with it into a new one. So where do
images reside? In that twilight, limbo, space with no end nor
beginning, in the unfinished and the “undone” , in the process,
the becoming, in the attempt, in the failure. We try and when we
come close and closer to god we fall in our mortal trap. Small gods
as we are, carrying the spark of creation and the ability to create,
we produce images only to fall back with them away from paradise into
the shadows where we begin again.
"In a Station of the Metro" is one of my all-time favorite poems. I find it fascinating that you included it in your answer. As I understood it, you consider Pound's poem an example of an image?
ReplyDeleteAdditionally, your exploration of Hebrew words for "image" is really interesting as well...
I considered the "Great Eskimo Vocabulary Hoax" when thinking about this prompt and human linguistic breadth, in general, but I was not able to formulate a clear articulation of why I think having many words to express subtle differences in general concepts is very much related to our understanding of "image"...
I really like how you explained it!